2023 Mutual Fund

Here's how the Mutual Fund works: Invest 1 or 2 shares in the Fund at $50.00 per share( maximum of 2 shares per person). I'm able to invest up to 22 shares, but, my total shares contribution will be determined by how many people sign up. Yes, I will put my money where my mouth is! I do the handicapping work. I make the picks. I determine what units will be invested in each pick. Unit plays will fall into 4 possibilities: 1-unit; 1/2-unit; 1/4-unit and 1/5-unit. (A 1-unit play represents my strongest play). The most you can lose is the value of your share(s). Either 50.00 or 100.00. You cannot lose more. How much can you win? I make no guarantees, but, I'll work my ass off to have a successful year. If I'm blessed to have a good year, I will deduct 20% of each share's profits as payment for my work. My goal is to have picks announced prior to the start of games, but, that is not a guarantee. Sometimes I'm handicapping games right up until the start times. The picks will be given out within minutes of the game(s) starting, with the lines and units on each play. My goal is to start the Mutual Fund on September 28th, but, i reserve the option of starting it one week later. The Mutual Fund ends with the Army vs.Navy game, the unofficial end of the regular season. Payment shares will come soon after. Mutual Fund status will be updated every Tuesday of the regular season, once the fund officially starts. It should be a lot of fun and I tried to make the risk very small. If you sign up, I hope you enjoy it. Email me at sam@college-edge.com if you have any questions. You can make payment right here, at this site via PayPal or call 267-918-1064 if you'd like to arrange another mode of payment or, if you have any questions.

Monday, September 17, 2012

#CollegeEdge Week3 Picks(and Pans): Part II

UConn over Maryland: I went to sleep Friday night pretty sure I had no interest in game. Huskies a road favorite, with a sub-par QB. I have to work my real-life job on Saturdays. I decided while working, to re-consider this contest. I have this process I go through while handicapping games where I ask myself the following questions( I had already worked this game Friday night, so didn't need my books). I applied it to UConn-Mary. Will UConn run the ball on Mary.(relatively)? Will UConn pass the ball on Mary.(No)? Will Mary. run the ball on UConn(No)? Will Mary. pass the ball on UConn(No)? Who has the better incentives in the game?
UConn became a recommendation because I thought they'd have relative success running the ball, they had the slightly better defense, and the Huskies had the clear incentive advantage in the game.Coach Edsall of Mary. left his UConn job immediately after their Fiesta Bowl loss to Oklahoma and never said goodbye to his players. There were some -2.5s out there and that's the line I got. I hope it's the line you got, and not a -3, which would have produced a Push. I'd pick UConn again!

UConn/Maryland under the totals: 2 rotten offenses vs. 2 pretty good defenses are good reasons to go under. 395 total yards in game should have gotten me the cover. It didn't.

B.C. over Northwestern: Eagles have 17 starters back from last year, including a returning starter at QB. Okay, QB Rettig's career has been mediocre, but, he is a multiple-year starter, and BC brought in a new Offensive Coordinator who is supposed to be a QB developer. Also, Northwestern, came into the game as a favorite, first time this year, so I thought everything was set up nice for the Eagles. Most disappointing loss of the week

Stanford over USC: I leaned Cardinal, but, I guess I allowed USC hype, and serious revenge motives for Trojans to trump the fact I had Stanford rated higher than USC. Trust your ratings?

Stanford/USC over the totals: Surprised how many injuries USC had on defense, and, supposed proficiency of Trojan offense, led to lean, but, not recommendation on the over. I'd probably do it again, but, was surprised by how physical Stanford played. Don't expect that from a West Coast team.

MSU over Notre Dame: Defense and RB Bell were my reasons for MSU recommendation. After all, that supposed good D was playing a freshman QB. Spartan QB was so bad, however, I never felt my pick had a chance.


No comments:

Post a Comment